Thursday, June 14, 2007

Bare Bones



“Genius might be the ability to say a profound thing in a simple way.”
- Charles Bukowski



There's no RoboWriters meeting tonight because of an event at the Uptown Writer's Space. It's the first night of The First Annual Chicago Lions and Typers Festival. It's a three day festival of readings from members of the Uptown Writer's Space and special guests.

The first form of this event occurred in 1924 on Cap d'Antibe in France. The first Lions and Typers Festival (known then only as the Lions Festival) began at the beach house of Gerald and Sara Murphy. The first attendees were Pablo Picasso and his aging mother, Gertrude Stein, Bunny Williams, Cole Porter and - of course - Hemingway and Fitzgerald. The French festival included sandcastle building, boxing and cliff diving.


Brian Crowley, from the Thursday night RoboWriters Group, and I will have scenes read on Saturday night at 6:30pm with other members of our group reading the roles. Please join us.


This week is also The Eighth Annual SKALD Storytelling Competition produced by WNEP in cooperation with the City of Chicago Department of Cultural Affairs. Tonight is the Kid's Skald and I will be checking it out. I went to the main event last year and it was very exciting. It's what's theater is all about. Strip away all the razzle-dazzle and there better be a good story under there. This is theater unplugged.


VIDIOCY - There's a short video competition in Chicago produced by Jason Chin and Jeff Griggs that's very popular among the improv/sketch crowd. Basically, the filmmakers meet and randomly pull titles out of a hat. Then they have 30 days to create a video that fits the title. I like to keep tabs on former students of mine after they leave the writing program. One of my former students, Joe Avella, created the winning video from the most recent competition.

Basically, he took everything I taught and threw it out the window.

And, it's very funny. He's the guy in the stovepipe hat.

WARNING: There is profanity in this and beaucoup buttcheekage.


Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Yikes! I Agree With Bush!

This is from the BBC, one of my most trusted sources for news about the U.S.

BUSH PUSHES IMMIGRATION OVERHAUL

Speaking after a rare visit to Senate Republicans on Capitol Hill, Mr Bush said he understood there were divisions within the party, but urged action.

"Now is the time to get it done," he said. "The status quo is unacceptable."

A proposed immigration law bill stalled last week after the Senate failed to vote to make progress on the measure.

The main stumbling block was opposition from all but a handful of Republicans.

The bill would have tightened border controls, but given 12 million illegal immigrants already in the US a way to legal status and citizenship.

The bipartisan Senate bill had elements which were hard for both Democrats and Republicans to accept.

Some critics called it an "amnesty" for those who had illegally entered the US, while other opponents argued its guest worker programme threatened American workers.

© BBC MMVII

You can read the full story by clicking HERE.


Look, it is not very often that I will use such a loaded word in describing someone, but here it is...

George W. Bush is a dunderhead.

That's right. I said DUNDERHEAD.

Only a dunderhead claims he's for the people while providing huge tax cuts for the rich. Only a dunderhead starts a preemptive war with a country not linked to the enemy we were already battling in another country. Only a dunderhead thinks that sending more troops to said quagmire is a fresh new strategy. Only a dunderhead fights terrorism by creating a situation that inspires and recruits more terrorists.

The only people more ignorant than him are the people who heard him speak and thought "Yep, that guy gets my vote!"

The only people dumber than that are the ones who re-elected him. I can only assume they are also the ones who have so fervently and stupidly followed him into creating a near empirical state of the union.

So, it shocks me to say that I agree with him on something. I agree with him on the Immigration Reform Bill. It's the right thing for America, being that it's America and all, to rally behind.

One of the main stumbling blocks in getting the bill passed comes from George's own Republican trenches. There are Republican senators claiming this bill is tantamount to amnesty for illegal aliens. It's not amnesty. People who spout that rhetoric don't know what the hell amnesty is - how frightening that our own elected officials don't know how to use a dictionary. Assuming they do have an intern who looked up the word for them, then who are they protecting with this deflection? Their own budget for cheap, domestic labor? The billion dollar companies that moved factories to Mexico to take advantage of cheap labor? Their workers might get an option to legally go to America and make a decent wage. I suspect senators are being pressured by special interests in the agriculture, textiles and construction industries. Pressure from anyone who has relied heavily on cheap on-the-down-low labor ever since slavery was abolished.

Amnesty, by definition, is a complete pardon with no repercussions. This ain't that. There's a $5,000 fine (at 12 million estimated illegal aliens, that's a lot of shiny new tanks for us to buy!). This bill lays out a rigorous path for current illegal aliens to become legit, which could take several years. In other words, they have to work hard for it and show appreciation for citizenship. Some opposition is from people who think this is too strict. Well, it should be a little difficult. I agree that these people have broken the law, but don't deserve to be rotting in one of our overcrowded jails. Unless it's being a whiny socialite's bunkmate. But that would be too cruel, for them.

We need these people and we need to give them an opportunity to live in this country without fear of deportation while making a decent wage.

Bush might make you feel all icky inside, but if this bill doesn't pass, it will probably go the way of health care reform.


Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Straightening Out Them Gays


This appeared in the Chicago Tribune...

GIBSONIA, Pa. -- Proponents say participation is surging in the controversial, often religious-based therapy that many call the "ex-gay movement."

Christian therapist Warren Throckmorton points to a patient named Jeff as an example of success for this therapy.

Jeff, 41, who asked that his last name not be used, said his life has always been centered on family, church and work as a college administrator outside Pittsburgh. But every few months, to satisfy an urge that would well up inside him, it was all about gay bathhouses, clubs and anonymous sex with men.

The subject has even become a part of the dispute over President Bush's nominee for surgeon general. Dr. James Holsinger, a Kentucky cardiologist who helped establish a church that reportedly helps gays "walk out of that lifestyle," is opposed by gay activists.

"He's helped me to put the same-sex attraction in the same category as any other sin," Jeff said.

You can read the full article HERE

Copyright © 2007, Chicago Tribune


Well, I've got some bad news for these guys.

If you are gay, you're gay.

If you are not gay, it's because you are not gay.

I'm not gay. But I'm not gay simply because I'm not gay.

The closest I ever came to being gay was buying a George Michael CD. I had to close my eyes and think of Sheena Easton the whole time. (It was the '80's).

I have been not gay since I was in the womb. Anyone who is gay, has been gay that long, too. Around six-to-eight weeks into baby-baking, we all get a wash of hormones through our system. This wash, along with genetic codes, determines our sexuality. So, if being gay is a sin, these fags have been offending God and choking on weenie since before they were born.

Now, it's not always a clear cut case of being straight or gay. Some people are bi-sexual for the same reasons stated above. It's a genetic roll of the dice. This "un-gaying" therapy might work better on them by having them favor one team over the other. However, if you deny someone what they are naturally inclined to desire, they are going to want it even more. Even if Jeff is bi, Jeff's body may belong to his wife, his fantasy life belongs to the Navy on shore leave.

This reminds me a lot about what I'm learning in my Harlem Renaissance class where people, primarily whites, would get together and discuss "The Negro Problem." Just like the problem here isn't the "Negroes" the problem isn't the gays. The problem lies with the people who perceive there's a problem to begin with. Like people who perceive white as "superior," these people perceive straight as superior and right in the eyes of the Lord.

We don't have to do anything about gays except let them be gay. And you don't have to do anything about me except let me be straight.

Although I do sometimes think about George Clooney. It's not sexual. I just want to be held.

Monday, June 11, 2007

Insert Spelling Bee Pun Here




THEATRE REVIEW


The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee
Music & Lyrics by William Finn
Book by Rachel Sheinkin
Directed by James Lapine
Drury Lane Theatre Water Tower Place












There are two parts to this review. An assessment of the show and how it was developed.


1) It's good. Go see it.

I could leave it at that, but here's more to back it up.

This show, while dealing with racial and social stereotypes and the role parents play in shaping - or damaging - the personalities of children, is very funny and light. It plays that double-edge of a Bullwinkle cartoon where kids will enjoy it and parents will get it's darker moments.

The musical is almost two hours long and performed without an intermission, which I think is a slight mistake. There's a bit of a drag in the last half hour that I think wouldn't happen if the audience took a ten minute breather.

The cast is all brilliant with great comic timing and solidly comfortable in their characters. Eric Roediger is incredible as the phlegmatic William Barfee (pronounced bar-fay). I have previously only seen scenes from this show on last year's Tony Awards, and from what I could tell, Eric was able to take this iconic character from the show and make it his own without altering the dynamics. Quite a feat. I was also blown away by Marcy Park (played by Christine Bunuan) who has the most racially stereotyped role, second only to the Community Service Comfort Counselor, Mitch Mahoney (James Earl Jones II, showing some nice range as he slips into other supporting roles). Marcy is an over accomplished little Asian Catholic school girl who speaks six languages and is very oppressed by her parents into being "all business." She really lets it rip in her send-off song where she twirls a baton, does gymnastics, plays piano and really belts out a rockin' tune. That was the energy peak of the show and everything that came after seemed anti-climactic.

What I also enjoyed about the show is how they use the whole space - the lobby and the audience included - as their playground. There are even four audience volunteers who are used as other contestants. This is a very smart move. It's a competition, people need to be eliminated, but you don't want to can any of your main characters right away. They take good care of their volunteers, too. Even in such a raucous number as Pandemonium which has everyone, including the volunteers, running all over the stage. It also helped develop a connection between the audience and the show. There was a vested interest in seeing one of our own up there.

Bottom line, it's a smart, funny piece that's well-performed.


2) How it was developed. When I first heard about this show and saw snippets of it on The Tony Awards, I was suspicious. Second City had done a similar sketch back in the early '90's with Steve Carrell and Steve Colbert. Like that sketch, this show deals with racism, winning and losing, and trying to be true to yourself as a child in facing an adult world (on a side note, the SC sketch in it's original form was much edgier and ended in violence. Since Columbine, the ending has been sadly watered down in the touring company shows and now has a non-violent "message." Barf.) My impression was that this show was just an over bloated sketch using music for filler.

My suspicions were confirmed - in my mind, anyway - when I heard that the show was developed through improvisation. I came across that information when I was talking to a friend of mine in New York and mentioned that the writer of the musical's book, Rachel Sheinkin, looked really uncomfortable during her acceptance speech for Best Book for a Musical. She probably looked uncomfortable because she didn't write the dialogue. It was mostly written by the original cast while the piece was being developed as a play called C-R-E-P-U-S-C-U-L-E by a compnay called
The Farm. Now, I don't fault her for winning a Tony and I don't know exactly what her contribution was. I suspect her role was more like a documentarian who takes miles and miles of film footage and crafts a story. But I do think those original cast members should have been on stage with her. After seeing the show, I recommend going to their website and seeing the cut from the original show. You'll see characters and bits that made it to the final version, but also characters that were cut. So, should those actors be included as writers of the piece? Yeah, I think so. What gets cut from the show also helps define what emerges. There could have been upwards to twenty people on that stage with her.

Developing material through improvisation is a huge chemistry experiment. Change one element - from a cast member to the stage manager - and things could turn out differently. It's tricky terrain when it comes to taking ownership of the material. Second City sometimes gets into hot water with it's actors over it. Their policy is that the scenes themselves belong to Second City, the characters created belong to the improviser who created it. Given the amount of material that's been generated there over 45 years, it's the smartest thing to do. Just in Chicago, I've seen a few shows developed through collaborative improvisation only to see their potential devolve over equal representation of the characters in the show to quarrels over ownership of the material down the road. I applaud The Farm for seeing worth in their material and having the foresight to be able to turn it over to others to shape. In the show itself, you can see the fruits of their labor. The show plays like a tight, improvised, longform musical with cutaways in the moment that take us deeper into the psyche of the characters.

By the way, while bearing a similarity to that SC sketch, Putnam County stands on it's own.

The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee is a bright, fun evening and a fine example of how improvisation can be used to develop sustainable material.

Saturday, June 9, 2007

Saturday Morning Cartoons!


Somewhere in the nether regions of late morning and early afternoon, before the sports, the reruns of syndicated shows or movies kicked in, there was the infamous... live action TV show!!! Most of them ran half an hour, so I can't show you a full episode of anything.


Here's the opener and closer of an episode of a variety show called The Harlem Globetrotters Popcorn Machine that ran for one season in 1974. As a kid, I probably saw the Harlem Globetrotters play three or four times. I loved them and I was fortunate to see them at their peak in the 70's. Meadowlark Lemon was the first autograph I ever got. Meadowlark and Curly, my other favorite, are on this cut, buy sadly underused.


Enjoy!

Friday, June 8, 2007

Jay's Message to new playwrights

http://jayraskolnikov.blogspot.com/2007/06/woah-now-baby-gal.html

Year of the Dog

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/business/la-et-dog6jun06,1,5404281,full.story?ctrack=2&cset=true

Screenwriters Laura Kightlinger, Mike White fight like cats and dogs over script

One screenwriter says her friend -- another screenwriter -- copied ideas from a script.
By Robert W. Welkos, Times Staff Writer
June 6, 2007

They were friends and neighbors. She remembers him calling her late at night to bum a cigarette and discuss their lives as struggling writers and actors in Hollywood. He remembers bonding over their love of animals and helping her search the hills when her cat disappeared.

But everything shattered after she wrote a screenplay about a woman obsessed with rescuing cats — and he wrote a screenplay about a woman obsessed with rescuing dogs.

Now, Laura Kightlinger is suing Mike White in Los Angeles County Superior Court, claiming she gave him her script, "We're All Animals," to read only to discover he was making a film called "Year of the Dog," which the suit contends relied on the script about her life as a cat rescuer.

The White film, which stars "Saturday Night Live" alumna Molly Shannon, was released April 13 by Paramount Vantage to largely positive reviews — it earned a 72% on the RottenTomatoes.com film website — but has generated just $1.5 million in box office receipts.

White, who wrote and directed the film, vigorously denies the allegations, insisting that beyond a general thematic similarity, the two scripts have different plots, characters and dialogue.

"They are totally different scripts," he said in a telephone interview. " … I know there is a similarity in the sense that [the female leads] both have pets that they care about, but beyond that, everything she is saying that is similar seems like a real stretch to me."

In a town where film and TV ideas are often discussed among friends over lattes and laptops, Kightlinger's lawsuit provides a cautionary tale for screenwriters: How far should writers go when discussing their ideas, especially with other writers?

Kightlinger is not alleging copyright infringement. Instead, the suit, which was filed in October and will soon enter the deposition phase, claims that because White is also a producer, there was an expectation that he would compensate her if he used her script in some way.

"Our claim is not a copyright claim but rather a breach of 'implied' contract claim," said Jennifer McGrath, Kightlinger's attorney. "Mike and Laura were friends, but he was also a writer-producer. There was an expectation that if she told him her idea and he was going to use it in some way, she would be paid and she would also be involved in the project."

White's attorney, Louis P. Petrich, said in an e-mail to The Times that what Kightlinger asked White to read was "not a list of ingredients, but rather a specific story with delineated characters and a detailed sequence of events. … Mike's movie is not that story."

A survey of the two scripts shows some similarities in basic plot elements: In each, the lead character loses her pet — one dies and one wanders off; each brings her animal rights activism to the workplace, where she is eventually fired; each begins hoarding animals; and each visits a farm. Most other key plot points and characters differ.

Eric Weissmann, a Beverly Hills entertainment lawyer who is not a party to the lawsuit, said Kightlinger faces significant legal hurdles. "Anybody can do a movie about somebody who is obsessed with an animal … but then the question is, 'Was there really an implied agreement? And was the agreement really about that?' "



Industry veterans

White and Kightlinger are seasoned writers and actors.

Kightlinger was a staff writer on "Will & Grace" and "Roseanne." She's also an actress and comedian, who appeared as Nurse Sheila on "Will & Grace" and was a featured player on "Saturday Night Live" in the 1990s [she impersonated O.J. Simpson prosecutor Marcia Clark].

Kightlinger also created, produced and stars in the IFC cable network's comedy series "The Minor Accomplishments of Jackie Woodman."

White drew Hollywood's attention when he wrote and starred in the quirky 2000 indie film "Chuck & Buck," portraying a young man who stalks his boyhood pal to reconnect with their past. He has written and acted in Jack Black's hit comedy, "School of Rock," the Jennifer Aniston vehicle "The Good Girl" and "Orange County." He also wrote and produced Black's Mexican-themed wrestling comedy "Nacho Libre."

Kightlinger said she first met White in 1996. He later was a frequent visitor in the home she shared with Black, who was her then-boyfriend. The two men later became producing partners, but today run separate production companies, although they continue to have joint projects.

She said that she based her screenplay on her experiences in the zany and often heart-rending world of cat rescues.

For example, while working at "Will & Grace," Kightlinger said she helped set up feeding stations for stray cats that roamed the grounds of CBS Studios on Radford Avenue in Studio City. Her work with strays became so well known, she said, that her co-workers even altered the name on her office door to read "Catlinger."

A tall, raven-haired woman with striking dark eyes, Kightlinger is given to self-deprecating humor. At one point in the interview, she quipped: "I'm not embarrassed to be called a cat lady, or a dog lady or even a dog." She currently has a dog and two cats.



Animal rescue

Kightlinger said that during her conversations with White, she mentioned wanting to write about women in Hollywood who bonded over rescuing animals and how her relationship was falling apart because of work with animals. She wrote her screenplay in 2002 and showed it to White.

"I read it and told her it was great and told her if she wanted me to have a part [acting] in it, I would do it," White said. " … But I never made any kind of agreement that I would use it — nor did I use her script."

White said he and Black posed for photographs holding a copy of her screenplay. She planned to imprint the photos on T-shirts so they could be worn to a film festival in a bid to fuel interest from studios and production companies. A spokesman for Black said the actor declined to comment.

Kightlinger said she gave White a new draft of her script in late 2003 or early 2004. She said she agreed in 2004 to allow a production company, Catapult Films, to shop her screenplay to the studios but found no buyers.

Then early last year, she read in the Hollywood Reporter that White had struck a deal with Paramount to make "Year of the Dog." She called to congratulate him and offered to "punch up" his script with jokes or other dialogue if he wanted her to, but according to the lawsuit, she says he declined, saying she would find his script "boring" and "wouldn't like it."

White denies this. He said he told her: "It's not really a jokey movie but I think you'll like it."

When her agent sent her White's screenplay to read for a potential part, Kightlinger said she felt it was like a "stab in the back." She telephoned White and "I said, 'What is going on?' And he said, 'Well, does it matter as long as you get it out there? Get the word out about animals?' "

White denies this conversation ever occurred. He said she left an "accusatory" message on his answering machine. "She and I have never ever spoken about [my] script since she got it," he said.

Now, the two don't speak. "This was an old friend," she said. "He knew how personal it was to me. He would laugh at things that I was doing [rescuing cats] … and then using it and made it feel like it was his experience."

But White maintains that he based his film on his life — not hers.

White, who has two cats and two dogs, said the movie "came out of me losing a pet and replacing that pet with a lot of pets and becoming involved in animal rights, becoming a vegan." He noted that he had a cat named Bootlegger, a former stray, who was found dead in the neighbor's yard.

"That whole story line came out of my own life," he said. The reason he made a movie about dogs instead of cats was because "dogs are easier to train in movies and easier to [film]."

In an anguished e-mail to The Times, White wrote, "I would never do what she's accusing me of doing" and called her allegations "a surreal … nightmare from which I hope to wake."

"The only thing that has ever mattered to me as far as my work was that people thought I was original and that I had integrity," he wrote. "I never cared if they thought I was weird or uncommercial or an acquired taste or whatever. That Laura is seeking publicity for herself by trying to damage what I have spent my career trying to create seems cruel."

As for Kightlinger, her frustrations over "Year of the Dog" are not unlike the anger expressed by the main character in a screenplay she wrote called "Better Than J.C." A struggling actress named Amanda discovers that another actress named J.C. has ripped off one of Amanda's funny catchphrases and used it in a wildly popular TV commercial. J.C. is then rocketed into the national spotlight.

In the script, Amanda says of J.C.'s success: "I can't help but think it should have been me and not you."

Kightlinger said she began writing the script before her friendship with White took off, finished it after they had become friends and she showed it to him in confidence.


robert.welkos@latimes.com